Originally Posted by SpinMeRightRound It's getting tougher because people like you are stupid enough to keep advertising how soft it 🍐 is on a forum full of people who take poker seriously. Honestly, where is your common sense? This is at 🍐 least the 6th post I've seen from you saying how soft the site is.
Originally Posted by Top Pig Am I 🍐 right in seeing that you can't choose which table to play on at Unibet? A site so basic is bound 🍐 to be very susceptible to bot potential.
Surely people who take poker seriously will find their way themselves to Unibet in 🍐 one way or another even without people posting how soft the site is.As Unibet is still a growing site its 🍐 imo more important to let the player pool grow with whoever wants to play on it and this will result 🍐 in more active games,Unibet Poker getting bigger (as they are still a small % of the Unibet branch), having more 🍐 resources to attract more rec players through publicity and so on.And lets be honest, its not like every ex HUD 🍐 reg is now suddenly going to crush stakes on Unibet where they cant play with any extra software.No idea why 🍐 people are always so concerned about bots on smaller sites or on sites where u can play anonymous. Sure there 🍐 is potential but on which site isnt there a potential for bots nowadays? One almost won the TCOOP 08 on 🍐 Stars... U are afraid of moving to another poker site incase u MIGHT get scammed by bots, while u probably 🍐 are getting scammed by bots on a daily/weekly base on a site like PS. And I dont blame PS for 🍐 all of this as its the way it is now in the time we live in with all the technology 🍐 available.And Unibet has changed things in the past on their software to prevent bots/aiding software to work on their platform 🍐 and Im sure they will keep doing this in the future.And to answer the thread question, yes its definitely worth 🍐 switching over if u want to play microstakes.
prognóstico de apostas esportivas
